- Thank you received: 0
Meshing a small complex object from a .geo file
- BenWilson94
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
4 years 5 months ago #2889
by BenWilson94
Meshing a small complex object from a .geo file was created by BenWilson94
Hello,
I’m trying to solve a problem set on an unbounded domain, which is truncated a long way from the region of interest. I’m running into a few difficulties, which I suspect are relatively easy to do, but I’m not sure what the correct procedure is:
1) I'm running into issues when the inner model has a complex geometry (made up with multiple primitive objects and defined in a .geo file) and placed in a domain with truncation far from the object around 100 times the size of the object. In such cases, the Netgen gets stuck finding points or edges, but works when the outer boundary is placed closer to the object. Is there anything I could try to solve this?
2) In an attempt to overcome 1), I’ve attempted to resize my domain. Eg consider a simple case where the inner region is a sphere and the outer truncation domain is also a sphere (of much larger radius) and considering the two cases
a) inner sphere radius 1, outer sphere radius 100
b) inner sphere radius 0.1, outer sphere radius 10
how can I best control the mesh spacing so that they result in a similar number of elements?
Kind regards,
Ben
I’m trying to solve a problem set on an unbounded domain, which is truncated a long way from the region of interest. I’m running into a few difficulties, which I suspect are relatively easy to do, but I’m not sure what the correct procedure is:
1) I'm running into issues when the inner model has a complex geometry (made up with multiple primitive objects and defined in a .geo file) and placed in a domain with truncation far from the object around 100 times the size of the object. In such cases, the Netgen gets stuck finding points or edges, but works when the outer boundary is placed closer to the object. Is there anything I could try to solve this?
2) In an attempt to overcome 1), I’ve attempted to resize my domain. Eg consider a simple case where the inner region is a sphere and the outer truncation domain is also a sphere (of much larger radius) and considering the two cases
a) inner sphere radius 1, outer sphere radius 100
b) inner sphere radius 0.1, outer sphere radius 10
how can I best control the mesh spacing so that they result in a similar number of elements?
Kind regards,
Ben
4 years 5 months ago #2890
by cwinters
Replied by cwinters on topic Meshing a small complex object from a .geo file
Hi Ben,
1) Could be that you just need to scale the bounding box of your CSGeometry properly to get it running.
If a part of your geometry reaches out of the default domain (should be a cube [-1000,1000]^3), the find edges algorithm might not succeed.
2) When you scale everything properly (every maxh and the bounding box) you should get similar numbers of elements. See the attached file.
Best,
Christoph
1) Could be that you just need to scale the bounding box of your CSGeometry properly to get it running.
Code:
geo.SetBoundingBox(Pnt(xmin,ymin,zmin),Pnt(xmax,ymax,zmax))
2) When you scale everything properly (every maxh and the bounding box) you should get similar numbers of elements. See the attached file.
Best,
Christoph
Attachments:
The following user(s) said Thank You: BenWilson94
- christopher
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
- Thank you received: 101
4 years 5 months ago #2891
by christopher
Replied by christopher on topic Meshing a small complex object from a .geo file
you can set the boundingbox in the geo file as well:
Code:
boundingbox(xmin,ymin,zmin; xmax, ymax, zmax)
The following user(s) said Thank You: BenWilson94
- BenWilson94
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
4 years 5 months ago #2892
by BenWilson94
Replied by BenWilson94 on topic Meshing a small complex object from a .geo file
Hello Both,
Thank you for your replies, that seems to have solved it. Thank you both!
Kind regards,
Ben
Thank you for your replies, that seems to have solved it. Thank you both!
Kind regards,
Ben
Time to create page: 0.122 seconds