- Thank you received: 108
two questions related to DG
6 years 7 months ago #429
by joachim
Replied by joachim on topic two questions related to DG
Hi Guosheng,
You are right, variable coefficients and curved elements (non-constant Jacobians) are treated the same way. Instead of solving with a mass matrix with coefficient rho, we apply a mass matrix with coefficient 1/rho. Everything is calculated on the fly without computing mass matrices. This trick is explained in this paper:
C Koutschan, C Lehrenfeld, J. Schöberl: Computer Algebra meets Finite Elements: an Efficient Implementation for Maxwell's Equations in: Numerical and Symbolic Scientific Computing: Progress and Prospects, Ulrich Langer and Peter Paule (ed.), pp. 105-122. 2011. Springer, Wien, arxiv.org/abs/1104.4208
Best,
Joachim
You are right, variable coefficients and curved elements (non-constant Jacobians) are treated the same way. Instead of solving with a mass matrix with coefficient rho, we apply a mass matrix with coefficient 1/rho. Everything is calculated on the fly without computing mass matrices. This trick is explained in this paper:
C Koutschan, C Lehrenfeld, J. Schöberl: Computer Algebra meets Finite Elements: an Efficient Implementation for Maxwell's Equations in: Numerical and Symbolic Scientific Computing: Progress and Prospects, Ulrich Langer and Peter Paule (ed.), pp. 105-122. 2011. Springer, Wien, arxiv.org/abs/1104.4208
Best,
Joachim
- Guosheng Fu
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 6
6 years 7 months ago #435
by Guosheng Fu
Replied by Guosheng Fu on topic two questions related to DG
I see... very interesting! Thanks for the reference
This reminds me the low-storage DG or weight-adjusted DG method of Tim Warburton. Although he used a nodal basis...
This reminds me the low-storage DG or weight-adjusted DG method of Tim Warburton. Although he used a nodal basis...
Time to create page: 0.111 seconds